![]() ![]() While it is understandable that many long-time readers who hoped for a conventional James Bond adventure would have been thrown by The Spy Who Loved Me’s unusual format, the novel was still a daring and interesting narrative experiment. ![]() As such, The Spy Who Loved Me’s story of a woman running from her past would have been a confusing non-sequitur for viewers attending Roger Moore's latest James Bond movie. Even now, the James Bond franchise conjures up images of glamorous locations, high-risk stunts, hand-to-hand combat, and expensive automobiles. By 1962, had established a successful formula of 007 running through his usual gamut of gambling, fighting, chase scenes, and witty repartee with his nemeses, and these aspects were all the more acute in the movie adaptations of the series. These criticisms would likely have been mirrored by a movie adaptation that stuck to The Spy Who Loved Me’s strange narrative. ![]() Fleming's usual careful construction.” One of the kinder summations of the novel, The Observer’s review, called The Spy Who Loved Me “ regrettable if not altogether unreadable.” While Kingsley Amis’s first James Bond novel Colonel Sun had a hard time following in Fleming’s footsteps, these brutal write-ups proved that Fleming himself struggled to broaden the definition of what a James Bond story could be. The Glasgow Herald claimed that Felimg’s “ ability to invent a plot has deserted him,” while The Times said that The Spy Who Loved Me “ lacks Mr. Critics savaged Fleming’s experimental effort upon release. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |